Anti-Fragile GTM

Use case library

Cut enrichment costs without cutting coverage

Pilot-then-scale workflows with per-provider cost tracking and coverage floors.

The problem

Your enrichment bill doubled last quarter. Coverage is still at 60%. Nobody knows which provider is delivering value and which is burning credits on bad data.

The system

  1. Measure per-provider. Coverage, accuracy, and cost per field per provider.
  2. Optimize waterfall order. Cheapest provider that meets the accuracy floor goes first.
  3. Pilot new providers. Test on 50 rows before committing budget.
  4. Set coverage floors. Records below minimum coverage do not enter outbound.

Field notes

Most teams overspend on enrichment because they never measured per-provider ROI. The fix is measurement, not a cheaper provider.